LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Reply to: Comment on ‘Geophysical approach to the study of a periglacial blockfield in a mountain area (Ztracené kameny, Eastern Sudetes, Czech Republic) by Stan et al. (2017). Geomorphology 293, 380‐390

Photo from wikipedia

Abstract The authors present the answer to the discussion paper presented by Uxa et al. (2018). The remarks provided will explain ambiguities regarding the use of geophysical methods used to… Click to show full abstract

Abstract The authors present the answer to the discussion paper presented by Uxa et al. (2018). The remarks provided will explain ambiguities regarding the use of geophysical methods used to detect ice in typically nonconducive environments that are potentially unfavourable to its occurrence, namely the quartzite block cover Ztracene kameny (1245 m asl). The authors discuss the most important remarks regarding ice formation and preservation. Discussion points focus on the following: (1) permafrost in low altitude blockfields and related environmental settings, (2) geophysical interpretation, (3) extreme quartz/quartzite resistivities hypotheses, and (4) additional comments.

Keywords: comment geophysical; reply comment; approach study; geomorphology; geophysical approach; study periglacial

Journal Title: Geomorphology
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.