LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Size of Lugol-unstained lesions as a predictor for risk of progression in premalignant lesions of the esophagus.

Photo from wikipedia

BACKGROUND AND AIMS At present, surveillance strategy for pre-malignant esophageal lesions in China is based solely on the pathologic diagnosis in Lugol's chromoendoscopy (LCE). In this study, we sought to… Click to show full abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS At present, surveillance strategy for pre-malignant esophageal lesions in China is based solely on the pathologic diagnosis in Lugol's chromoendoscopy (LCE). In this study, we sought to determine the degree to which various unstained features under LCE may lead to improved ability to predict the risk of progression in esophageal lesions. METHODS We re-examined and followed up on 1058 subjects who had Lugol-unstained lesions (LUL) together with a pathologic diagnosis, which was lower than severe dysplasia at baseline screening based on a population-based randomized controlled trial over a median time of 5.8 years. We established a logistic regression model and calculated the adjusted cumulative incidence of severe dysplasia or malignancy. RESULTS LUL size was predictive of progression to malignant lesions in individuals with a nondysplastic diagnosis (adjusted OR 6-10 mm VS ≤5 mm =6.7; 95% CI, 1.7-25.7; adjusted OR >10 mm VS ≤5 mm =27.9; 95% CI, 7.3-105.7), and the corresponding adjusted cumulative incidence of malignant lesions was 3.6 and 13.2 per 100 persons. This is higher than that of small (≤5mm) lesions, which showed mild dysplasia (2.7 per 100 persons), a condition for which surveillance every 3 years is recommended. 65.3% of interval cancers missed at surveillance under the current approach would be detected if individuals with medium (6-10 mm) and large (>10 mm) nondysplastic LULs were additional monitored. CONCLUSIONS We propose a modified surveillance strategy that combines findings under LCE examination and the pathologic analysis, where follow-up endoscopy is recommended for individuals with relatively large nondysplastic lesions.

Keywords: unstained lesions; lugol unstained; surveillance; risk progression; progression

Journal Title: Gastrointestinal endoscopy
Year Published: 2020

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.