In this article, the associations among individual socio-economic characteristics, the institutional set-up of health care systems, and satisfaction with the health care system are investigated. Data from the 2011 International… Click to show full abstract
In this article, the associations among individual socio-economic characteristics, the institutional set-up of health care systems, and satisfaction with the health care system are investigated. Data from the 2011 International Social Survey Program (30 countries, 34,212 respondents) is used. Multilevel analyses across countries have shown how the state financing context affects satisfaction at the individual level. Consistent with previous research, at individual level, personal experiences with medical providers, age, gender as well as income are significant predictors of satisfaction with the health care system. At the country level, real input indicators such as density of physicians and density of hospital beds are negative predictors of satisfaction with the health care system whereas the percentage of total health expenditures comprised by public sources is a positive predictor of satisfaction with the health care system. However, findings from the cross-level interactions indicate that the negative effect of lower income is more prominent in predominately publicly-funded health care systems. Specifically, in primarily publicly-funded health care systems, the model-predicted probability of satisfaction with the health care system is higher, but the gap in the probability of satisfaction with the health care system between individuals with lower income and those with higher income is greater than that in mostly privately-financed health care systems. The findings in this study suggest that the future direction of health care system reform should be focused on balancing the distribution of resources between private and public sectors.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.