Purpose Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) at time of implantation was previously shown to reduce thromboembolic events (TEs) in continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs); however, the efficacy of… Click to show full abstract
Purpose Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) at time of implantation was previously shown to reduce thromboembolic events (TEs) in continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs); however, the efficacy of LAAO in HM3 recipients is unknown. This study aims to assess the clinical impact of LAAO in HM 3 patients. Methods Adults receiving first HM3 implantation from November 2014 through December 2019 at our center were retrospectively reviewed. TEs included device thrombosis and ischemic strokes. Patients were classified by whether they received LAAO or not. Incidence of TEs was compared between groups using cumulative incidence curves with competing risks (death and heart transplant) and risk factors for TEs were assessed with Fine and Gray competing risk regression. Results 182 patients received HM 3s during the study period. Ninety-nine HM3 patients (54%) received LAAO versus 83 (46%) who did not. Zero LAAO patients (0%) had prior coronary artery bypass grafting, compared to 35 patients (42%) who did not receive LAAO (p Conclusion A low number of TEs was observed in HM3 recipients. LAAO did not further reduce the rate of TEs in this patient population.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.