LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Combined Utility of Aortic Pulsatility Index and Pulmonary Artery Pulsatility Index for Risk Stratification in Advanced Heart Failure Patients

Photo by jordansteranka from unsplash

Purpose To assess the prognostic role of simultaneous biventricular function using hemodynamic parameters in advanced heart failure patients. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 184 patients undergoing a milrinone drug study at… Click to show full abstract

Purpose To assess the prognostic role of simultaneous biventricular function using hemodynamic parameters in advanced heart failure patients. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 184 patients undergoing a milrinone drug study at time of right heart catheterization (RHC) at our institution from January 2013 to January 2019. Aortic pulsatility index (API) was calculated as (systolic blood pressure - diastolic blood pressure)/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, and pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPI) was calculated as (systolic pulmonary artery pressure - diastolic pulmonary artery pressure)/central venous pressure. Using our team's previous identification of cutpoint values for API and PAPI, 1.45 and 2.3, respectively, we stratified patients into the following groups: (1) High API, High PAPI; (2) High API, Low PAPI; (3) Low API, High PAPI; and (4) Low API, Low PAPI. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine association with escalation of therapy, defined as left ventricular assist device implantation, heart transplantation, or death. Results Low API, Low PAPI was associated with escalation of therapy or death at 30-days (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.23 - 9.49, p = 0.024). Low API, Low PAPI and Low API, High PAPI were also associated with the one-year endpoint of freedom from escalation of therapy or death (OR 3.63, 95% CI 1.55 - 8.75, p = 0.003; OR 4.13, 95% CI 1.5 - 12.45, p = 0.008; respectively). In multivariate analysis, both of these risk statuses remained significant predictors of the one-year endpoint when adjusting for Fick cardiac index (OR 3.72, 95% CI 1.5 - 9.48, p = 0.005; OR 4.18, 95% CI 1.49 - 12.82, p = 0.009; respectively). Conclusion The combined use of API and PAPI possesses utility for risk stratification regarding both short- and long-term freedom from escalation of therapy or death.

Keywords: pulmonary artery; papi; pulsatility index; heart; index

Journal Title: Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
Year Published: 2021

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.