LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

No otoacoustic evidence for a peripheral basis of absolute pitch

Photo from wikipedia

ABSTRACT Absolute pitch (AP) is the ability to identify the perceived pitch of a sound without an external reference. Relatively rare, with an incidence of approximately 1/10,000, the mechanisms underlying… Click to show full abstract

ABSTRACT Absolute pitch (AP) is the ability to identify the perceived pitch of a sound without an external reference. Relatively rare, with an incidence of approximately 1/10,000, the mechanisms underlying AP are not well understood. This study examined otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) to determine if there is evidence of a peripheral (i.e., cochlear) basis for AP. Two OAE types were examined: spontaneous emissions (SOAEs) and stimulus‐frequency emissions (SFOAEs). Our motivations to explore a peripheral foundation for AP were several‐fold. First is the observation that pitch judgment accuracy has been reported to decrease with age due to age‐dependent physiological changes cochlear biomechanics. Second is the notion that SOAEs, which are indirectly related to perception, could act as a fixed frequency reference. Third, SFOAE delays, which have been demonstrated to serve as a proxy measure for cochlear frequency selectivity, could indicate tuning differences between groups. These led us to the hypotheses that AP subjects would (relative to controls) exhibit a. greater SOAE activity and b. sharper cochlear tuning. To test these notions, measurements were made in normal‐hearing control (N = 33) and AP‐possessor (N = 20) populations. In short, no substantial difference in SOAE activity was found between groups, indicating no evidence for one or more strong SOAEs that could act as a fixed cue. SFOAE phase‐gradient delays, measured at several different probe levels (20‐50 dB SPL), also showed no significant differences between groups. This observation argues against sharper cochlear frequency selectivity in AP subjects. Taken together, these data support the prevailing view that AP mechanisms predominantly arise at a processing level in the central nervous system (CNS) at the brainstem or higher, not within the cochlea. HighlightsNo substantial difference in SOAE activity between absolute pitch subjects and controls.No difference in SFOAE phase‐gradient delays between absolute pitch subjects and controls.The data argue against sharper cochlear frequency selectivity in absolute pitch subjects.

Keywords: pitch; evidence peripheral; frequency; basis; absolute pitch

Journal Title: Hearing Research
Year Published: 2018

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.