Contemporary S-ICDs with programmed SMART Pass algorithms and conditional zones will not mitigate scenarios of oversensing during bradycardia. Introduction Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICD) have been shown to be noninferior to… Click to show full abstract
Contemporary S-ICDs with programmed SMART Pass algorithms and conditional zones will not mitigate scenarios of oversensing during bradycardia. Introduction Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICD) have been shown to be noninferior to conventional transvenous ICDs with respect to device-related complications and inappropriate shocks. For patients who meet indications for an ICD and do not require bradycardia pacing, antitachycardia pacing, or cardiac resynchronization therapy, it is becoming an attractive option to avoid vascular complications. Complications such as leadmalfunction and infection aremore common with the transvenous ICD, whereas inappropriate shocks are more commonwith the S-ICD. The majority of inappropriate S-ICD therapies results from T-wave oversensing, but there are also reports of QRS double or triple counting, especially in times of electrolyte derangements. We report a case where oversensing of multiple components of a ventricular escape rhythm resulted in inappropriate shocks owing to a unique S-ICD algorithm.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.