LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

P045 Kidney transplant with historic but no current DSA – A case study

Photo by hans_isaacson from unsplash

Presence of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) at the time of transplant is associated with poor outcome. DSA may be present in historic serum samples but not at the time of… Click to show full abstract

Presence of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) at the time of transplant is associated with poor outcome. DSA may be present in historic serum samples but not at the time of a kidney offer. Going forward with the transplant holds the risk of a memory B-cell response upon re-exposure to a specific HLA antigen or epitope. A patient with X-linked Alport syndrome was investigated for a kidney transplant. Anti-HLA class II antibodies were observed following pregnancy, which were specific to her husband’s mismatched DR and DQ antigens. A year later, she received a blood transfusion and had an episode of aseptic peritonitis while on dialysis. Class I HLA antibodies appeared but were observed over a period of 7 months. Thereafter, anti-HLA antibody screening using FlowPRA beads and identification using Luminex single antigen beads showed disappearance of class I antibodies but persistence of a single anti-HLA-DR antibody developed after prior pregnancy. Three years later, a kidney from a DCD donor was offered and transplanted despite presence of historic DSA against 2 HLA-B antigens. A CDC crossmatch proved negative using a current serum whereas a flow cytometric crossmatch using 3 DSA-containing historic sera gave positive but inconsistent results (T + B+, T-B+, T-B-). One week after transplant, historic DSA reappeared (3000 MFIs). Despite absence of biopsy-proven rejection, short-term treatment comprising plasmapheresis, rituximab and low-dose IVIg was initiated. DSA quickly disappeared from circulation with only an HLA-DR-specific reactivity from the previous pregnancy. Without any further desensitization treatment, the patient has not demonstrated re-appearance of DSA nor experienced antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) as demonstrated upon for-cause and protocol biopsies, up to 8 months posttransplant at the time of abstract submission. This case demonstrates that, although DSA may reappear following re-exposure to a sensitizing HLA antigen/epitope, acceptable transplant outcome can be achieved without AMR. Time between DSA development and transplant could be a factor in identifying acceptable HLA mismatches.

Keywords: transplant historic; kidney transplant; dsa; hla

Journal Title: Human Immunology
Year Published: 2018

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.