Abstract Lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (LS2) can be biomimetically textured by crystal orientation, mimicking the microstructure of dental enamel and inducing anisotropic mechanical responses to crack growth. The deliberate texturization of… Click to show full abstract
Abstract Lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (LS2) can be biomimetically textured by crystal orientation, mimicking the microstructure of dental enamel and inducing anisotropic mechanical responses to crack growth. The deliberate texturization of LS2 plays to the clinical advantage of reinforcing weak sites of typical fracture initiation in dental prosthetic constructs. Similar to enamel, adhesion of biomimetically textured LS2 could also show anisotropic behavior. Therefore, tensile bond strength (TBS) before and after thermocycling (TC) and interfacial characterization of biomimetically textured LS2 (parallel (PAR) or perpendicular (PER) crystal orientation) after different pre-treatment modes (hydrofluoric acid etching (HFE), grit blasting (GBL) and self-etching glass-ceramic primer (SGP)) were investigated. TC reduced significantly TBS for all specimens except for GBL. Biomimetic textured LS2 after HFE showed anisotropic behavior regarding adhesion. Crystal orientation reduced TBS for the PER HFE specimens after TC significantly. In general, the TBS of HFE specimens was still higher or not significantly lower compared to other pre-treatment modes like GBL or SGP. For the GBL and SGP specimens, crystal orientation had no influence on TBS and interfacial characteristics. In contrast HFE specimens showed different interfacial characteristics depending if they were PAR or PER texturized. Based on these findings, HFE of biomimetic textured LS2 can be recommended. For bonding, the PAR orientation is recommended as its adhesion potential is less prone to degrade.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.