LAUSR

BACKGROUND Evidence of sympathetic and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activation provided a rationale for neurohormonal antagonism in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), while no data are available in patients with milder degree of systolic dysfunction. We aimed to investigate neurohormonal function in HF with preserved and mid-range EF (HFpEF/HFmrEF). METHODS Three cohorts (n = 189/each) of stable HFpEF, HFmrEF and HFrEF patients were selected (median age 70, 67 and 67 years; male 56%, 73% and 74%, respectively). Patients received a baseline clinical assessment including plasma renin activity (PRA), aldosterone, catecholamines, and N-terminal fraction of pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) assays, and were followed-up for all-cause death. RESULTS Neuroendocrine profile was similar between HFpEF and HFmrEF, while all neurohormones except epinephrine were higher in HFrEF than in HFmrEF (NT-proBNP 2332 ng/L, IQR 995-5666 vs 575 ng/L, 205-1714; PRA 1.7 ng/mL/h, 0.4-5.6 vs 0.6 ng/mL/h, 0.2-2.6; aldosterone 153 ng/L, 85-246 vs 113 ng/L, 72-177; norepinephrine 517 ng/L, 343-844 vs 430 ng/L, 259-624; all p < 0.001, epinephrine 31 ng/L, 10-63 vs 25 ng/L, 10-44; p = 0.319). These findings were unrelated to treatment heterogeneity. Ten percent of HFpEF patients had elevated PRA, aldosterone and norepinephrine vs. 8% in HFmrEF and 21% in HFrEF. During a 5-year follow-up, survival decreased with the number of neurohormones elevated (HFpEF: log-rank 7.8, p = 0.048; HFmrEF: log-rank 11.8, p = 0.008; HFrEF: log-rank 8.1, p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS Neurohormonal activation is present only in a subset of patients with HFpEF and HFmrEF, and may hold clinical significance. Neurohormonal antagonism may be useful in selected HFpEF/HFmrEF population.