LAUSR

Abstract The secondary vortex structure of an impingement jet system is enhanced by V-ribs on both the impingement and target plates. Numerical and experimental investigations are conducted to study the flow field and heat transfer resulting from V-rib turbulators in an impingement cooling configuration. Three different cases are tested: V-ribs on both the impingement and target plates (V-rib), V-ribs only on the impingement plate (V-rib-impingement) and V-ribs only on the target plate (V-rib-target). The experiment is carried out on a 9 by 9 inline impingement array test facility. For the transient measurements, narrow band thermochromic liquid crystals (TLC) and thermocouples are applied to obtain the local heat transfer distribution. Pressure taps are used to measure the pressure loss. The numerical simulation is carried out with ANSYS CFX 14, using a steady state Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) approach and the Shear Stress Transport (SST) turbulence model. All studies are done for a Reynolds number range of 15,000 to 35,000. There is a good overall agreement between the experimental and numerical results for the cases studied. The detailed flow field from the numerical simulation is used to understand and complement the phenomena observed in the experiment. The evaluation of the flow field confirms that the V-ribs enhance the secondary flow structure in the impingement system and induce a positive heat flux ratio compared to the baseline case. Both experimental and numerical results show a Nusselt number increase for the V-rib-impingement and V-rib configuration, with a highest Nusselt number ratio of 1.16. Notice that the experiment cannot take the rib part into account due to the invalid 1D semi-infinite wall assumption there, while the CFD simulation allows for the consideration of heat transfer on the rib surface and thus complements the heat flux data on the target plate. Depending on the configuration, the CFD simulation shows a heat flux ratio of 1.06–1.34. The pressure loss of the system is comparable to the case with a smooth impingement plate and a smooth target plate.