LAUSR

Abstract The current era of earth observation now provides constellations of open-access, multispectral satellite imagery with medium spatial resolution, greatly increasing the frequency of cloud-free data for analysis. The Landsat satellites have a long historical record, while the newer Sentinel-2 (S2) satellites offer higher temporal, spatial and spectral resolution. The goal of this study was to evaluate the relative benefits of single- and multi-seasonal multispectral satellite data for discriminating detailed forest alliances, as defined by the U.S. National Vegetation Classification system, in a Mediterranean-climate landscape (Sonoma County, California). Results were compared to a companion analysis of simulated hyperspectral satellite data (HyspIRI) for the same study site and reference data (Clark et al., 2018). Experiments used real and simulated S2 and Landsat 8 (L8) data. Simulated S2 and L8 were from HyspIRI images, thereby focusing results on differences in spectral resolution rather than other confounding factors. The Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier was used in a hierarchical classification of land-cover (Level 1), followed by alliances (Level 2) in forest pixels, and included summer-only and multi-seasonal sets of predictor variables (bands, indices and bands plus indices). Both real and simulated multi-seasonal multispectral variables significantly improved overall accuracy (OA) by 0.2–1.6% for Level 1 tree/no tree classifications and 3.6–25.8% for Level 2 forest alliances. Classifiers with S2 variables tended to be more accurate than L8 variables, particularly for S2, which had 0.4–2.1% and 5.1–11.8% significantly higher OA than L8 for Level 1 tree/no tree and Level 2 forest alliances, respectively. Combining multispectral bands and indices or using just bands was generally more accurate than relying on just indices for classification. Simulated HyspIRI variables from past research had significantly greater accuracy than real L8 and S2 variables, with an average OA increase of 8.2–12.6%. A final alliance-level map used for a deeper analysis used simulated multi-seasonal S2 bands and indices, which had an overall accuracy of 74.3% (Kappa = 0.70). The accuracy of this classification was only 1.6% significantly lower than the best HyspIRI-based classification, which used multi-seasonal metrics (Clark et al., 2018), and there were alliances where the S2-based classifier was more accurate. Within the context of these analyses and study area, S2 spectral-temporal data demonstrated a strong capability for mapping global forest alliances, or similar detailed floristic associations, at medium spatial resolutions (10–30 m).