IMPORTANCE Despite approximately 4,400 unresectable U.S. cases annually, high-stage basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is ill-defined. OBJECTIVE Develop a tumor (T) staging system for BCC predicting metastasis/death and compare its performance… Click to show full abstract
IMPORTANCE Despite approximately 4,400 unresectable U.S. cases annually, high-stage basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is ill-defined. OBJECTIVE Develop a tumor (T) staging system for BCC predicting metastasis/death and compare its performance to AJCC 8th edition (AJCC8) T staging. DESIGN BWH T staging was developed from a previously published nested cohort of 488 primary BCCs. Tumors were staged via BWH and AJCC8 T staging systems and prediction of metastasis and/or death was compared. RESULTS BWH and AJCC8 T staging systems both captured all metastases/deaths in high T stages (BWH T2; AJCC8 T3/T4). BWH T2 included 54% fewer cases ≥2cm compared to AJCC8 T3/T4. BWH had higher specificity (0.92 vs 0.80, p<0.001) and positive predictive value (24% vs 11%, p<0.001) for identifying cases at risk for metastasis/death, and C statistic was superior for BWH (p<0.001). BWH T2 ten-year cumulative incidence of metastasis/death was 37% (21-60%). LIMITATIONS Two-center cohort CONCLUSIONS: and Relevance: BWH and AJCC BCC staging both capture all metastases and deaths in upper stages. However, BWH does so in half the number of cases thus minimizing inappropriate up-staging. Risk of metastasis or death in BWH T2 BCC is sufficient to warrant surveillance for recurrence and clinical trials of adjuvant therapy.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.