LAUSR

OBJECTIVES To determine the opinions of pharmacists who supervise immunizing pharmacy technicians regarding initial trust of immunizing technicians, perceived quality of the training program, need for additional on-the-job training, frequency of technician utilization, and recommendations for other pharmacists who are considering implementation of an immunizing technician. SETTING Albertsons pharmacies located in the state of Idaho in May 2017. PRACTICE DESCRIPTION AND INNOVATION Qualitative descriptive study of semistructured key informant interviews with Idaho pharmacists who currently supervise a pharmacy technician trained to administer immunizations. EVALUATION Informant interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded to evaluate key themes. RESULTS Nineteen individual pharmacist interviews were conducted at different Albertsons pharmacy locations in the state of Idaho. Pharmacists in this study felt that their immunizing technicians were properly trained to administer immunizations, capable of giving immunizations, and empowered by their new role within the pharmacy. Participants expressed challenges with initial comfort in allowing a technician to immunize, support of this new advanced technician role, and additional on-the-job training for individual technicians. Findings also included a pharmacist-perceived increase in vaccination rates and recommendation for other technicians to be trained to administer immunizations. CONCLUSION Community pharmacists who supervise pharmacy technicians trained to administer immunizations were receptive to this new advanced technician role. Pharmacists' opinions revealed that working with newly trained immunizing pharmacy technicians has not only positively affected the morale of their team, but can help to increase the number of vaccinations given by the pharmacy. Understanding pharmacist perceptions about technicians as immunizers may lead to regulation changes and adoption of this advanced technician role.