LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Timeliness of data entry in Wisconsin Immunization Registry by Wisconsin pharmacies.

OBJECTIVE To assess the association of various immunization- and pharmacy-related factors with the timeliness of pharmacy data entry in a state immunization information system. DESIGN A cross-sectional study was conducted.… Click to show full abstract

OBJECTIVE To assess the association of various immunization- and pharmacy-related factors with the timeliness of pharmacy data entry in a state immunization information system. DESIGN A cross-sectional study was conducted. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Data for 2,040,248 immunizations administered by pharmacies in Wisconsin during 2012-2017 were collected from the Wisconsin Immunization Registry (WIR). Variables, including the submission method, immunization administration year, vaccine type, and recipient age, were analyzed through multivariate logistic regression to determine if they had a relationship with data entry timeliness. Pharmacists were surveyed on immunization data entry practices to corroborate analysis findings. OUTCOME MEASURES Timeliness of immunization data entry in WIR was measured as a binary variable: 7 days or fewer or more than 7 days after immunization. RESULTS Influenza immunizations were statistically significantly less likely to be timely compared with noninfluenza immunizations (odds ratio [OR] 0.719 [95% CI 0.712-0.726]; P < 0.0001). Immunizations administered to individuals aged more than 18 years were less timely compared with immunizations administered to individuals aged 6-18 years. The magnitude showed a slight difference in timeliness but without statistical significance (0.989 [95% CI 0.972-1.006]; P > 0.05). For submission method, flat-file submission was less likely to be timely compared with manual entry (0.48 [95% CI 0.475-0.486]; P < 0.0001). Health Level-7 submission, involving the electronic exchange of information with electronic health systems, was much more likely to be timely compared with manual entry (1.989 [95% CI 1.972-2.007]; P < 0.0001). With each successive year, from 2012 to 2017, immunizations were entered in a less timely manner (0.981 [95% CI 0.979-0.983]; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Timeliness of pharmacy data entry in WIR was associated with entry method, vaccine type, and immunization administration year. We hope to identify ways to help pharmacies improve immunization data entry in WIR and facilitate the communication of immunization information among providers.

Keywords: data entry; immunization; immunization registry; entry; wisconsin immunization

Journal Title: Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA
Year Published: 2020

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.