LAUSR

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing patients demonstrate hip biomechanics closer to normal in comparison to total hip arthroplasty during gait. However, it is not clear how symmetric is the gait of hip resurfacing patients. Biomechanical data of 12 unilateral metal-on-metal hip resurfacing participants were collected during gait at a mean time of 45months (SD 24) after surgery. Ankle, knee, hip, pelvis and trunk kinematics and kinetics of both sides were measured with a motion and force-capture system. Principal component analysis and mean hypothesis' tests were used to compare the operated and healthy sides. The operated side had prolonged ankle eversion angle during late stance and delayed increased ankle inversion angle during early swing (p=0.008; effect size=0.70), increased ankle inversion moment during late stance (p=0.001; effect size=0.78), increased knee adduction angle during swing (p=0.044; effect size=0.57), decreased knee abduction moment during stance (p=0.05; effect size=0.40), decreased hip range of motion in the sagittal plane (p=0.046; effect size=0.56), decreased range of hip abduction moment during stance (p=0.02; effect size=0.63), increased hip range of motion in the transverse plane (p=0.02; effect size=0.62), decreased hip internal rotation moment during the transition from loading response to midstance (p=0.001; effect size=0.81) and increased trunk ipsilateral lean (p=0.03; effect size=0.60). Therefore, hip resurfacing patients have some degree of asymmetry in long term, which may be related to hip weakness and decreased range of motion, to foot misalignments and to strategies implemented to reduce loading on the operated hip. Interventions such as muscle strengthening and stretching, insoles and gait feedback training may help improving symmetry following hip resurfacing.