Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) restores joint stability following ACL injury but does not attenuate the heightened risk of developing knee osteoarthritis. Additionally, patellar tendon (PT) grafts incur a greater… Click to show full abstract
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) restores joint stability following ACL injury but does not attenuate the heightened risk of developing knee osteoarthritis. Additionally, patellar tendon (PT) grafts incur a greater risk of osteoarthritis compared to hamstring grafts (HT). Aberrant gait biomechanics, including greater loading rates (i.e. impulsive loading), are linked to the development of knee osteoarthritis. However, the role of graft selection on walking gait biomechanics linked to osteoarthritis is poorly understood, thus the purpose of this study was to compare walking gait biomechanics between individuals with HT and PT grafts. Ninety-eight (74 PT; 24 HT) subjects with a history of ACLR performed walking gait at a self-selected speed from which the peak vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) during the first 50% of the stance phase and its instantaneous loading rate, peak internal knee extension and valgus moments, and peak knee flexion and varus angles were obtained. When controlling for time since ACLR and quadriceps strength, there were no differences in any kinetic or kinematic variables between graft types. While not significant, 44% of the PT cohort were identified as impulsive loaders (displaying a heelstrike transient in the majority of walking trials) compared to only 25% of the HT cohort (odds ratio = 2.3). This more frequent observation of impulsive loading may contribute to the greater risk of osteoarthritis with PT grafts. Future research is necessary to determine if impulsive loading and small magnitude differences between graft types contribute to osteoarthritis risk when extrapolated over thousands of steps per day.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.