LAUSR

Abstract Urban ecological infrastructures (UEIs; e.g., parks, beaches, rivers, forests, and woodlands) provide important ecosystem services (ESes) to urban ecosystems. Understanding the covariance of multiple ESes and disservices and their associations with social economic factors is a precondition of ecosystem management. Previous studies have mainly focused on ESes and tradeoffs among multiple ESes, whereas disservices and their associations with ESes have seldom been addressed. In this study, we took public urban parks, an important component of UEIs as well as the basic unit for management, as a case study and explored the ESes and disservices of different types of parks and the delivery of ESes to different social economic strata based on 187 plot inventory data. The results showed that the actual dominant ESes of four types of parks differed from both the expectations of planners and the demands of residents. Positive correlations existed among ESes and disservices (e.g. bio-emissions and air pollution reduction). Population density was positively related with several ESes; Distance to urban center was negatively associated with C storage, bio-emissions, and aggregative ES indicators; Wealthy areas had better performance in terms of C storage and aggregative ES indicators. Major challenges for the four types of parks and measures to coordinate ESes and disservices are discussed. Multiple stakeholder involvement, ES provision for low income populations, and the protection of parks in peri-urban and central urban areas are suggested.