Abstract Simulating this ecological risk transmission process helps to judge the key path and propose the accurate urban risk control measures. This paper develops an urban ecological risk transmission conceptual… Click to show full abstract
Abstract Simulating this ecological risk transmission process helps to judge the key path and propose the accurate urban risk control measures. This paper develops an urban ecological risk transmission conceptual framework based on Bayesian Network to quantify the non-linear transmission paths via HA (human activity) — ES (ecosystem service) — ER (ecological risk). Ecosystem services are used as ecological risk measurement endpoints to quantify service provision and possible adverse effects from human activities. Direct and indirect impacts of urban human activities that threaten ecosystem services were considered. Nine cities in the Pearl River Delta (China) are selected as a case to simulate the ecological risk transmission process. Results show that: (1) Zhongshan and Guangzhou tied for the city most at ecological risk and Foshan jumped to the city with the highest ecological risk after considering the impact of pollutions; (2) After analyzing the sensitive of human activities to ecological risks, the key risk transmission path of each city can be judged. There are three types of key paths: pollution dominant path (including Guangzhou, Foshan, Dongguan and Zhuhai), ES dominant path (including Shenzhen, Zhongshan and Jiangmen) and dual dominant path (including Zhaoqing and Huizhou); (3) Buildup area, afforestation area and wetland protection & restoration investment are the top three key human activities that impact the urban ecological risk. Adjusting these key variables can be simulated to effectively reduce the urban ecological risk. The model can be used as a useful tool to guide policy and risk management decisions, and to engage and negotiate with stakeholders with different views.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.