LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

An observational study of missing data enquiry from randomised trial authors showed a poor response.

Photo from wikipedia

BACKGROUND The quality of evidence from a meta-analysis might be affected by poor or inadequate reporting of individual randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The results of data request from authors has… Click to show full abstract

BACKGROUND The quality of evidence from a meta-analysis might be affected by poor or inadequate reporting of individual randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The results of data request from authors has not been investigated to date. METHODS After completion of a feasibility trial, the authors of 116 RCTs selected for inclusion in 4 meta-analyses and network meta-analyses were contacted via email to check abstracted data from their studies and/or provide missing data. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to investigate the association of response rate with predefined characteristics, including time interval between publication of the RCT and the date of contact, role of the contact author as corresponding author, the number of participating centers, the source of contact email address and risk of bias assessments. RESULTS The response rate to the primary email invitation was 31.1% (median response time 0 days, interquartile range (IQR) 0-1). Out of the authors who did not respond to the primary invitation, 31.2% responded to the reminder (median response time 1 day, IQR 0-3). Despite an overall response rate of 41%, both confirmation of data accuracy and supplementation of missing data were provided for 9 RCTs only (7.8%). No association was found between lack of response and predefined characteristics on univariable and multivariable analyses. CONCLUSION Despite a fair response rate, contacting authors of RCTs to check abstracted data and complete missing items yielded a very low rate of task completion. These findings highlight the importance of endorsing a data sharing culture among researchers. The role of alternative incentives is yet to be investigated.

Keywords: missing data; response rate; response; trial authors

Journal Title: Journal of clinical epidemiology
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.