LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Cement augmentation in the proximal femur to prevent stem subsidence in revision hip arthroplasty with Paprosky type II/IIIa defects

Photo from wikipedia

Background: Subsidence remains a common complication after revision hip arthroplasty which may lead to prolonged weight‐bearing restrictions, leg‐length discrepancies or considerable loss of function. We evaluated the effectiveness of cement… Click to show full abstract

Background: Subsidence remains a common complication after revision hip arthroplasty which may lead to prolonged weight‐bearing restrictions, leg‐length discrepancies or considerable loss of function. We evaluated the effectiveness of cement augmentation in the proximal femoral metaphysis during a revision of femoral components to prevent post‐operative stem subsidence. Methods: Forty patients were enrolled. Follow‐up averaged 67.7 months (range: 24–149). Twenty‐seven patients had a Paprosky type II defect and 13 had a type IIIa defect. All revision hip arthroplasty used a cementless, cylindrical, non‐modular cobalt–chromium stem. The defect in the metaphysis was filled with antibiotic‐loaded bone cement. Thirteen patients who had undergone stem revision only was allowed to walk immediately without weight‐bearing restrictions. Twenty‐seven patients who had undergone revision total hip arthroplasty was allowed partial weight‐bearing within 6 weeks after surgery in the consideration of acetabular reconstruction. Results: Three patients (7.5%) had post‐surgery stem subsidences of three mm, five mm, and 10 mm, respectively, at three, one, and 14 months. There were no acute surgical site infections. There were three femoral stem failures: two delayed infections and one periprosthetic Vancouver B2 fracture. Both five‐ and 10‐year survivorships of the femoral implant were 90.1%. Conclusion: An adequate length of the scratch‐fit segment and diaphyseal ingrowth remain of paramount importance when revising femoral components. To fill metaphyseal bone defects with antibiotic‐loaded bone cement may be an alternative method in dealing with proximal femoral bone loss during a femoral revision.

Keywords: revision; revision hip; stem; hip arthroplasty; subsidence

Journal Title: Journal of the Chinese Medical Association
Year Published: 2018

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.