LAUSR

OBJECTIVES This in vitro study aimed to compare the accuracy of implant placement in model surgeries carried out by implementation of three different navigational methods. METHODS An in vitro study was conducted on 3D printed study models randomly assigned to three study groups. In Group 1, model surgeries were assisted by AR-based dynamic navigation (Innooral System, Innoimplant Ltd, Budapest, Hungary). In Group 2, implants were placed with a free-hand method, and in Group 3, static CAIS was used (coDiagnostiX software, version 10.4 Dental Wings, Montreal, CA, USA). A total of 48 dental implants (Callus Pro, Callus Implant Solutions GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) were placed (16 implants in four models per study group). The primary outcome variables were angular deviation, coronal, and apical global deviation. These were calculated for all implants based on preoperative registration of the surgical plan and postoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) reconstruction. RESULTS The accuracy of implant placement using AR-based CAIS showed no significant difference compared to static CAIS (angular deviation, 4.09 ± 2.79° and 3.21 ± 1.52°; coronal global deviation, 1.27 ± 0.40 mm and 1.31 ± 0.42 mm; and apical global deviation 1.34 ± 0.41 mm and 1.38 ± 0.41 mm). Global deviation results were significantly lower with AR-based CAIS than the free-hand approach (coronal and apical global deviation of 1.93 ± 0.79 mm and 2.28 ± 0.74 mm, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Implant positioning accuracy of AR-based dynamic CAIS was comparable to that of static CAIS and superior to that obtained by the free-hand approach. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Implementing Augmented Reality based dynamic Computer Assisted Implant Surgery (CAIS) in model surgeries may enable implant positioning accuracy comparable to that provided by static CAIS and superior to that obtained through the free-hand approach. Further clinical studies are necessary to determine the feasibility of AR-based dynamic navigation.