LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

T-wave oversensing is more dependent on ICD sensitivity algorithm than lead sensing configuration.

Photo from archive.org

Modern implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) employ dynamic sensing algorithms in order to protect against fine ventricular fibrillation without oversensing intrinsic activity. We present a patient with a Medtronic ICD who… Click to show full abstract

Modern implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) employ dynamic sensing algorithms in order to protect against fine ventricular fibrillation without oversensing intrinsic activity. We present a patient with a Medtronic ICD who had inhibition of pacing and not inappropriate shocks due to T wave oversensing (TWOS) in both true bipolar (TB) and integrated bipolar (IB) sensing configurations. Rather than alternatives such as lead revision or programming to an unacceptably insensitive value, this was solved by exchanging for a Boston Scientific ICD. Although the literature suggests lead sensing configuration impacts TWOS, this case demonstrates ICD sensitivity algorithm may be a key determinant.

Keywords: icd sensitivity; lead sensing; wave oversensing; sensing configuration; sensitivity algorithm

Journal Title: Journal of electrocardiology
Year Published: 2018

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.