LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole vs. colistin or ampicillin-sulbactam for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: A retrospective matched cohort study.

Photo from wikipedia

OBJECTIVES This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) as monotherapy for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Acinobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) (CRAB) infections. METHODS This retrospective cohort study included… Click to show full abstract

OBJECTIVES This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) as monotherapy for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Acinobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) (CRAB) infections. METHODS This retrospective cohort study included patients receiving TMP/SMX as the main treatment for severe infections caused by CRAB, who were matched with patients treated with colistin or ampicillin-sulbactam (AMP/SUL) by age, Charlson score, department, and source of infection. Outcomes were compared among all patients and in a subgroup of propensity-score (PS) matched patients. The PS matching was performed using a match tolerance of 0.15 with replacement. RESULTS Fifty-three patients treated with TMP/SMX and 83 matched patients treated with colistin or AMP/SUL were included. Variables that were independently significantly associated with TMP/SMX treatment included admission for infection and septic shock, while abnormal cognition on admission and intensive care unit admission were associated with colistin or AMP/SUL treatment. All-cause 30-day mortality was lower with TMP/SMX compared with the comparator antibiotics among all patients (24.5%, 13 of 53 vs. 38.6%, 32 of 83, P=0.09) and in the PS-matched subgroup (29%, 9 of 31 vs. 55.2% 16 of 29, P=0.04). Treatment failure rates were not significantly different overall (34%, 18 of 53 vs. 42.4%, 35 of 83, P=0.339) and in the PS-matched subgroup (35.5%, 11 of 31 vs. 44.8%, 13 of 29, P=0.46). Time to clinical stability and hospitalization duration were significantly shorter with TMP/SMX. Patients treated with TMP/SMX probably had less severe infections than those treated with other antibiotics, even after matching. CONCLUSIONS TMP/SMX might be a valuable treatment option for TMP/SMX-susceptible CRAB infections. Given the very limited available treatment options, further studies assessing its effectiveness and safety are necessary.

Keywords: treatment carbapenem; treatment; trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole; tmp smx; baumannii

Journal Title: Journal of global antimicrobial resistance
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.