LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Association between Preoperative Adenomyosis Detection Rate during Pelvic Ultrasonography and the Specialty of the Reading Physician.

Photo from wikipedia

STUDY OBJECTIVE To compare the detection rate of adenomyosis when ultrasound is performed by a radiologist compared with a gynecologic expert sonologist. DESIGN A retrospective, single-center study. SETTING A university… Click to show full abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE To compare the detection rate of adenomyosis when ultrasound is performed by a radiologist compared with a gynecologic expert sonologist. DESIGN A retrospective, single-center study. SETTING A university teaching hospital. PATIENTS All women above 18 years of age with a positive histopathology diagnosis of adenomyosis obtained in a hysterectomy specimen from October 1, 2011, to October 1, 2017, were screened for inclusion. Cases without a preoperative pelvic ultrasound report, those with coexisting premalignant/malignant conditions, and patients presenting to the clinic with symptoms other than abnormal uterine bleeding, dysmenorrhea, or abdominal pain were excluded. A total of 412 cases were included in the final analysis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The preoperative ultrasound was performed by a radiologist in 241 patients (59%) and by an expert gynecologic sonologist in 171 patients (42%). Patients' age, body mass index, race, ethnicity, parity, and history of prior cesarean section were comparable between the 2 groups. The adenomyosis detection rate was significantly higher in the expert gynecologic sonologist group compared with radiologists (95 [56%] vs 29 [12%], p <.01). After controlling for patients' race, body mass index, prior cesarean sections, and presence of myomas using multivariable logistic regression, gynecologic expert sonologists were 7.8 times more likely to detect adenomyosis than radiologists (odds ratio = 7.84; 95% confidence interval, 4.58-13.44). Regardless of medical specialty, the presence of myomas significantly decreased the detection of adenomyosis compared with the absence of myomas (odds ratio = 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.39). CONCLUSION The detection rate of adenomyosis was significantly higher when ultrasound was performed by expert gynecologic sonologists compared with radiologists. The presence of myomas significantly decreased detection rates regardless of specialty. Ultrasound evaluation for detecting adenomyosis should be preferentially performed by gynecologic expert sonologists.

Keywords: adenomyosis; detection; specialty; detection rate; adenomyosis detection

Journal Title: Journal of minimally invasive gynecology
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.