Abstract Many studies have shown that attraction effects are consistently found for linguistic dependencies like subject-verb agreement, e.g., * The key to the cabinets are on the table . However,… Click to show full abstract
Abstract Many studies have shown that attraction effects are consistently found for linguistic dependencies like subject-verb agreement, e.g., * The key to the cabinets are on the table . However, not all dependencies are equally susceptible to attraction. A parade case involves reflexive-antecedent dependencies, which rarely show attraction effects. The contrast between agreement and reflexives with respect to attraction has motivated various proposals regarding the memory architecture for the parser, including the use of qualitatively different access mechanisms or the selective use of morphological features as retrieval cues for different dependencies. In this paper, we show how to systematically induce attraction effects for reflexives in three eye-tracking experiments. Furthermore, we show based on computational simulations that it is possible to derive both the presence and absence of reflexive attraction from the same retrieval mechanism, based on the ACT-R architecture. We then propose an account of why agreement and reflexives are differentially susceptible to attraction, based on the predictability of the dependency.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.