LAUSR

BACKGROUND Accumulating clinical evidence has indicated that sonothrombolysis can aid in the treatment of ischemic stroke; however, these findings remain controversial. The purpose of the present meta-analysis was to assess randomized clinical studies concerning the effects of sonothrombolysis on ischemic stroke to evaluate its safety and efficacy. METHODS We systematically searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMBASE databases for literature published between the inception of electronic data and May 2019 regarding sonothrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Only randomized controlled trials were included. Data extraction was based on patient characteristics, ultrasound variables (any duration or frequency, without microbubble), and outcome variables (safety and efficacy). RESULTS Five trials were included in the present study. Clinical functional recovery was evaluated at different time points (several days or 3 months), and heterogeneity was low. Sonothrombolysis did not lead to an increase in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhagic complications or death. Our results demonstrated that patients treated with sonothrombolysis had significantly higher rates of recanalization and asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage than patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis alone. In the subgroup of middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion patients, sonothrombolysis was found to greatly increase the efficacy outcomes compared to intravenous thrombolysis. CONCLUSIONS Evidence suggests that sonothrombolysis is a technically feasible and potentially effective treatment that has beneficial effects on recanalization and increases the rate of asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage in stroke patients. Additionally, short- and long-term clinical outcome analyses were improved in the MCA occlusion sonothrombolysis subgroup. Larger clinical trials of MCA occlusion patients are necessary to verify these findings.