LAUSR

OBJECTIVE Short and long interpregnancy intervals (IPIs) have been associated with various adverse outcomes, and a 2016 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee Opinion recommends an optimal IPI of 18 months to 5 years. Descriptive data on the IPI in Canada are lacking. The objective of this study was to examine IPIs in a Manitoba cohort. METHODS The study analyzed a subset of records from a larger dataset used to examine the IPI and adverse perinatal outcomes. For that study, Manitoba's Hospital Abstracts data were searched to identify births from 1985 to 2014. Each two consecutive live births to the same mother formed a sibling pair. The IPI was calculated as the interval between the two siblings' births, minus the younger sibling's GA. Information on maternal characteristics was extracted from various datasets housed in the Manitoba Population Research Data Repository. The current analysis examined second and higher-order births between 2010 and 2014. The proportion of suboptimal IPIs was determined and IPIs were cross-tabulated with birth year and maternal subgroups. RESULTS More than half of pregnancies were conceived following a suboptimal interval. IPIs of less than 6 months - which have been associated with the highest risk of adverse outcomes - were more prevalent among certain subgroups. These included younger women as well as women who received inadequate prenatal care, smoked or drank alcohol during pregnancy, were low income, or did not graduate from high school. CONCLUSION Suboptimal IPIs were common in this Manitoba cohort. Stakeholders should consider whether greater efforts to promote appropriate birth spacing are warranted.