LAUSR

OBJECTIVE To characterize fellowship training experiences in the 11 Canadian minimally invasive gynaecologic surgery (MIGS) programs and compare the surgical exposure of fellows in these programs to that of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) accredited fellowship in MIGS (FMIGS). METHODS In this cross-sectional study, 2017 and 2018 MIGS fellowship graduates across Canada were given an web-based survey via SurveyMonkey software to evaluate 5 key components of postgraduate fellowship curricula: 1) surgical exposure; 2) teaching and evaluation methods; 3) research experience; 4) clinical responsibilities; and 5) pursuit of other academic endeavours. Interest in creating a national standardized curriculum and seeking accreditation for MIGS fellowships were also examined. RESULTS The survey attained a 91% (20/22) response rate of the target population. All Canadian MIGS programs met the minimum standards for at least 62% (8/13) of the surgical competencies listed by the AAGL, with office hysteroscopy being the procedure with the largest discordance. Half of respondents (10/20) attended a program with an established curriculum, and 75% (15/20) believed there would be a benefit to standardizing training nationwide. Seventy percent (14/20) had published at least one manuscript during their fellowship and 60% (12/20) pursued postgraduate degrees. The majority (55%; 11/20) felt certain that MIGS should become a credentialed fellowship in Canada. CONCLUSION Canada has made meaningful progress in MIGS training over the past decade with 11 well-established fellowship programs. Although this survey identifies a general interest in standardized training and accreditation for Canadian MIGS programs, more research is needed on how best to accomplish this.