LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Survival and outcomes of different head sizes in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Photo by owenbeard from unsplash

The femoral head size influences dislocation, range of motion (ROM), functional outcome, wear, and survival after total hip arthroplasty (THA). These aspects of different head sizes with contemporary bearings in… Click to show full abstract

The femoral head size influences dislocation, range of motion (ROM), functional outcome, wear, and survival after total hip arthroplasty (THA). These aspects of different head sizes with contemporary bearings in primary THA have been reviewed. Based on the existing evidence, for highly-cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) bearings, a 32 mm cobalt chromium (CoCr) or ceramic head appears to be a suitable choice. If a 36 mm head with HXLPE is desired, a ceramic head may be preferable over CoCr due to reduced risk of fretting and corrosion with the former. For ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings, head sizes >36 mm do not appear to provide any significant benefit over 36 mm heads. Also, large ceramic heads may lead to increased risk of squeaking. If non-cross-linked PE bearing is considered for use, it would be prudent to opt for <32 mm head size.

Keywords: head; head sizes; different head; hip arthroplasty; total hip

Journal Title: Journal of orthopaedics
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.