LAUSR

Summary Background Split fractures of the lateral tibia plateau in young patients with good bone quality are commonly treated using two minimally invasive percutaneous lag screws, followed by unloading of the knee joint. Improved stability could be achieved with the use of a third screw inserted either in the jail-technique fashion or with a triangular support screw configuration. The aim of this study was to investigate under cyclic loading the compliance and endurance of the triangular support fixation in comparison with the standard two lag-screw fixation and the jail technique. Methods Lateral split fractures of type AO/OTA 41-B1 were created on 21 synthetic tibiae and subsequently fixed with one of the following three techniques for seven specimens: standard fixation by inserting two partially threaded 6.5 mm cannulated lag screws parallel to each other and orthogonal to the fracture plane; triangular support fixation—standard fixation with one additional support screw at the distal end of the fracture at 30° proximal inclination; and jail fixation—standard fixation with one additional orthogonal support screw inserted in the medial nonfractured part of the bone. Mechanical testing was performed under progressively increasing cyclic compression loading. Fragment displacement was registered via triggered radiographic imaging. Results Mean construct compliance was 3.847 × 10−3 mm/N [standard deviation (SD) 0.784] for standard fixation, 3.838 × 10−3 mm/N (SD 0.242) for triangular fixation, and 3.563 × 10−3 mm/N (SD 0.383) for jail fixation, with no significant differences between the groups (p = 0.525). The mean numbers of cycles to 2 mm fragment dislocation, defined as a failure criterion, were 12,384 (SD 2267) for standard fixation, 17,708 (SD 2193) for triangular fixation, and 14,629 (SD 5194) for jail fixation. Triangular fixation revealed significantly longer endurance than the standard one (p = 0.047). Conclusion Triangular support fixation enhanced interfragmentary stability at the ultimate stage of dynamic loading. However, the level of improvement seems to be limited and may not legitimate the intervention with an additional third screw.