LAUSR

CONTEXT - Migrant populations across Europe are aging and will increasingly need end-of-life care. OBJECTIVE - To gain insight into end-of-life care and decision-making for patients with a non-western migration background and assess differences compared to patients with a Dutch or western migration background. METHODS - A mortality follow-back study using a stratified sample of death certificates of persons who died between August and December 2015, obtained from the central death registry of Statistics Netherlands. Questionnaires were sent to the attending physician (n = 9,351; response 78%). Patients aged ≥ 18 who died a non-sudden death were included in this study (n = 5,327). RESULTS Patients with a non-western migration background are more likely than patients with a Dutch or western migration background to be admitted to and die in hospital (51,6% vs. 33,9% [OR 1.74 CI95% 1.26 - 2.41]; 39,1% vs. 20,1% [OR 1.96 CI95% 1.39 - 2.78]); less likely to receive morphine or morphine-like medication and continuous deep sedation (72,8% vs. 80,1% [OR 0.62 CI95% 0.43 - 0.89]; 16,8% vs. 25,2% [OR 0.52 CI95% 0.34 - 0.80]); and more likely to receive end-of-life care that, according to physicians, is directed at curation for too long (6,8% vs. 1,7% [OR 3.61 CI95% 1.83 - 7.12]). End-of-life decisions are made less frequently for patients with a non-western migration background (71,6% vs. 79,2% [OR 0.64 CI95% 0.45 - 0.91]). Characteristics of decision-making are similar. CONCLUSION - End-of-life care for patients with a non-western migration background focuses more, or longer on maximum, curative treatment and end-of-life decisions are made less often.