LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Enantioselective recognition of sutezolid by cyclodextrin modified non‐aqueous capillary electrophoresis and explanation of complex formation by means of infrared spectroscopy, NMR and molecular modelling

Photo by richardrschunemann from unsplash

Graphical abstract Figure. No Caption available. HighlightsCD‐NACE enantioseparation of sutezolid, linezolid and its precursor.Enantiospecific host:guest interactions by spectroscopic approach, FT‐IR, NMR.Molecular modelling were investigated to provide information about complex formation.… Click to show full abstract

Graphical abstract Figure. No Caption available. HighlightsCD‐NACE enantioseparation of sutezolid, linezolid and its precursor.Enantiospecific host:guest interactions by spectroscopic approach, FT‐IR, NMR.Molecular modelling were investigated to provide information about complex formation. ABSTRACT A method for the enantioseparation of sutezolid, the next analogue after linezolid and tedizolid, belonging to the truly new class of antibacterial agents, the oxazolidinones, was developed based on non‐aqueous capillary electrophoresis (NACE), using a single isomer of cyclodextrins as a chiral pseudophase. During the experiment, the enantioseparation of sutezolid together with its predecessor, linezolid, both weak base antibacterial agents, was evaluated using anionic single‐isomers of cyclodextrins from hydrophilic, up to hydrophobic: heptakis‐(2,3‐dihydroxy‐6‐sulfo)‐&bgr;‐cyclodextrin, heptakis‐(2,3‐diacetyl‐6‐sulfo)‐&bgr;‐cyclodextrin (HDAS‐&bgr;‐CD), as well as heptakis‐(2,3‐dimethyl‐6‐sulfo)‐&bgr;‐cyclodextrin (HDMS‐&bgr;‐CD), respectively. Based on the observed results, the cyclodextrins, HDAS‐&bgr;‐CD and HDMS‐&bgr;‐CD which carry the acetyl and methyl groups at the C2 and C3 positions, respectively, provided the baseline separation of sutezolid enantiomers. However, HDMS‐&bgr;‐CD led to a reversal of enantiomer migration order (EMO) in comparison to HDAS‐&bgr;‐CD. Instead, enantiomers of linezolid were separated only by HDMS‐&bgr;‐CD. During the experiments, different organic solvents and their mixtures in various ratios were tested. The selectivity and separation efficiency were critically affected by the nature of the buffer system, the type of organic solvent, and the concentrations of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) in the NACE buffer system. Focusing on the desired EMO in which the eutomers (S)‐sutezolid and (S)‐linezolid migrated last, the highest enantioresolution using the NACE method was achieved at normal polarity mode with 45 mM HDMS‐&bgr;‐CD dissolved in MeOH/ACN (85:15, v/v) containing 200 mM TFA/20 mM ammonium formate. Moreover, infrared spectroscopy, NMR and molecular modelling were investigated to provide information about complex formation.

Keywords: bgr; cyclodextrin; complex formation; spectroscopy; molecular modelling; nmr molecular

Journal Title: Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.