LAUSR

PURPOSE Tunneled central venous catheters (tCVCs) are routinely used for long-term venous access in children with cancer and chronic diseases. They may be inserted by surgical venous cut-down or percutaneously. The aim of this study was to compare the operative times and intraoperative complications of both techniques. METHODS This study compared group A (surgical venous cut-down, years 2002-2006) with group B (percutaneous, years 2008-2012). Patient characteristics, operative times, and intraoperative complications were obtained from surgical reports. (IRB review and approval, number 6/15). Both Hickman/Broviac and Portacath catheters were included. RESULTS 343 patients in group A and 321 patients in group B were studied. Ages at implantation and underlying diagnoses were similar. Operative time was significantly shorter in group B. Only 60% of primarily dissected veins were suitable for surgical implantation, whereas successful vessel puncture was possible in 96% (87% on the first attempt, 9% on the second). Bleeding occurred in 2% of patients in group A, and pneumothorax occurred in 1.8% of patients in group B. Early catheter dislodgement was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION Percutaneous tCVC implantation is safe, less invasive, and faster than surgical implantation. Both techniques are feasible, and complication rates are low. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.