BACKGROUND The option of either single- or two-staged cyst excision has been proposed for perforated choledochal cysts (CCs), but which of the two methods is more effective remains controversial. We… Click to show full abstract
BACKGROUND The option of either single- or two-staged cyst excision has been proposed for perforated choledochal cysts (CCs), but which of the two methods is more effective remains controversial. We examined the complications and short-term outcomes of single-stage excision of perforated and non-perforated CCs. METHODS The medical records of patients treated for CCs from 2003 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Outcomes were compared between patients with perforated CCs (Group A) and non-perforated CCs (Group B). The operative time, intraoperative bleeding, length of stay, and postoperative complications were analyzed. RESULTS Group A comprised 6 patients (2 males, 4 females; mean age, 29months), and Group B comprised 26 patients (2 males, 24 females; mean age, 41months). All patients underwent single-stage complete excision with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. There were no significant differences in the operative time, bleeding, and/or length of stay. There were no operative deaths or complications such as anastomosis leakage or postoperative cholangitis, but a pancreatic fistula developed in one patient in Group A and two in Group B. CONCLUSION Single-stage excision for a perforated CC is feasible if the patient's condition is stable. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE Treatment Study, LEVELIII.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.