LAUSR

PURPOSE We sought to examine the long-term clinical success rates of a bowel management program (BMP) for children with severe constipation or fecal incontinence. METHODS A single center review was conducted of children (≤18 years) enrolled in a BMP and followed in a colorectal specialty clinic (2011-2017). All patients who completed an initial week of the BMP were included. Patients enrolled in a BMP after 2018 were excluded. Success was defined as no accidents and <2 stool smears per week. RESULTS A total of 285 patients were reviewed. BMP was initiated at a median age of 7 years (9 months-17 years). Primary diagnoses included functional constipation (112), anorectal malformation (ARM) (104), Hirschsprung Disease (HD) (41), rectal prolapse (14), spina bifida (6), fecal incontinence (3) and other (5; 4 sacral coccygeal teratomas and a GSW to the buttocks). Initial bowel regimen included large volume enema in 54% and high dose stimulant laxative in 46%. The initial Bowel Management Week (BMW) was successful in 233 (87% of adherent patients) patients with 17 (6%) non-adherent. One hundred twenty-two patients had follow-up at 12 months (72% success amongst adherent patients, 7% of patient non-adherent) and 98 patients had follow-up at 24 months (78% success amongst adherent patients, 10% of patients non-adherent). 21/154 (14%) patients started on enemas were later successfully transitioned to laxatives and 13/132 (10%) patients started on laxatives subsequently required enemas in order to stay clean. Clinic phone contact occurred outside of scheduled visits for adjustment to the BMP in 44% of patients. 33% of patients had surgery to aid bowel management (antegrade colonic enema (ACE) = 81, resection + ACE = 13, diverting stoma = 4). Median follow up was 2.5 years (5 weeks-7 years). CONCLUSION Children who follow a structured BMP with readily available personnel to provide outpatient assistance can experience successful treatment of severe constipation or fecal incontinence long-term. A multi-institutional collaboration is necessary to identify factors which predict failure of a BMP and non-adherence. TYPE OF STUDY Single-center retrospective chart review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.