LAUSR

BACKGROUND Objective and subjective health are two powerful constructs which predict morbidity and mortality across a range of conditions including Type 2 Diabetes (T2D). Studies, however, suggest that these two constructs do not necessarily correlate, as some people with poor objective health perceive their health as good, while other people with good objective health perceive their health as poor. We seek to examine the role of personality as a moderator of the associations between objective and subjective health among older adults with T2D, who are likely to experience poor objective and subjective health due to their chronic medical condition. METHODS Cross-sectional study of 368 individuals with T2D (72 ± 4 years, 42% women), participating in the Israel Diabetes and Cognitive Decline Study. Personality was conceptualized using the five-factor model (agreeableness, conscientiousness, extraversion, neuroticism, openness). Objective health was operationalized by T2D-related clinical status, cognitive function, and motor ability. Subjective health was assessed using a single self-report question. Hayes' process macro was used for the moderation analyses. RESULTS The objective-subjective health associations were stronger among individuals with increased neuroticism (proportion of days covered: p = 0.02; cognitive function: p = 0.003; hand grip: p = 0.02; 3-m walk: p = 0.04) as well as decreased openness (cognitive status: p = 0.04) and agreeableness (3-m walk: p = 0.02). DISCUSSION Personality traits, and specifically neuroticism, can modify the associations between objective and subjective health in older adults with T2D. Findings contribute to the understanding of health as a multidimensional construct that encompasses medical and psychological aspects, especially among older adults with a chronic illness.