LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Antimicrobial prophylaxis for urinary tract infections: implications for adherence assessment.

Photo from wikipedia

BACKGROUND Continuous antimicrobial prophylaxis (prophylaxis) is associated with a reduction in recurrent urinary tract infections in children with vesicoureteral reflux. However, adherence to daily medications has been shown to be… Click to show full abstract

BACKGROUND Continuous antimicrobial prophylaxis (prophylaxis) is associated with a reduction in recurrent urinary tract infections in children with vesicoureteral reflux. However, adherence to daily medications has been shown to be poor. OBJECTIVE To determine patient/caregiver factors associated with non-adherence and to determine whether adherence alters the effect of prophylaxis on recurrent UTIs and renal scarring. STUDY DESIGN We conducted a secondary analysis of the Randomized Intervention for Children with Vesicoureteral Reflux trial. We stratified adherence scores into quartiles to assess trends within the data. We assessed predictors of non-adherence using ordinal logistic regression. We then examined the efficacy of prophylaxis stratified by adherence quartiles. RESULTS Six hundred patients were included in the analysis. The quartiles of adherence were as follows: 1st quartile-0-70% adherence; 2nd quartile-71-91% adherence; 3rd quartile-92-96% adherence; and 4th quartile->96% adherence. Neither demographic factors nor disease severity was associated with non-adherence. In the subanalysis of patients who were toilet trained at baseline, increasing bladder and bowel dysfunction (BBD) symptom score was associated with non-adherence (adjusted odds ratio, aOR = 1.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-1.2). Patients least adherent were 2.5 times more likely (95%CI 1.1-5.6) to have a recurrent UTI compared with patients most adherent. After controlling for treatment arm, age, sex, degree of reflux, BBD, and number of UTIs, patients least adherent (taking the study medication less than <70% of the time) were at highest risk for renal scarring (aOR = 24.2, 95%CI 3.0-197). In contrast, among the most adherent quartile, the probability of renal scarring was highest in those assigned prophylaxis (16.2% compared with 1.7% in those most adherent to placebo). CONCLUSIONS Adherence is distinctly related to clinical outcomes in children with VUR. Non-adherence is common and represents a distinct clinical entity that is associated with renal scarring. Adherence should be assessed in prophylaxis management algorithms.

Keywords: tract infections; urinary tract; adherence; non adherence; prophylaxis; antimicrobial prophylaxis

Journal Title: Journal of pediatric urology
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.