LAUSR

Abstract Porphyry Cu deposits are the world's most important source of Cu and the Central Andes of South America hold some of the largest Cu resources worldwide. In Argentina many porphyry-type deposits and prospects with different degrees of exploration straddle along ~1500 km of the Central Andes. The review and analysis of the tectono-magmatic, metallogenic and economic data of the better-known deposits and prospects allow to define the controls of porphyry-type mineralization and the metallogenic epochs and belts which in turn indicate the potential for porphyry-type mineralization in some relatively poorly explored segments of the Central Andes. Slab shallowing (particularly linked to the subduction of aseismic ridges) and associated eastward arc migration/expansion appears to be a favorable geodynamic scenario for Paleozoic and Cenozoic mineralizing magmatism which show variable adakitic signatures probably as a result of a progressive crustal thickening. In this context the V/Sc and especially the Sr/Y ratios are a useful tools for assessing magma fertility. Major WNW-trending deep crustal pre-Andean structures controlled the inland migration of the magmatism and are a first order control on porphyry emplacement during these epochs of magmatic activity. There are five favorable metallogenic epochs linked to the arc magmatism in Argentina: Permian, Upper Cretaceous-Eocene, late Eocene-early Oligocene, late Oligocene-early Miocene and Miocene-Pliocene. The Permian and Upper Cretaceous-Eocene metallogenic epochs are represented by a small number of deposits with low metal (Cu–Mo–Au) content; however, the extension of the magmatism of both epochs suggests they are favorable for further exploration. The late Eocene–early Oligocene magmatism involves few deposits but formed the second largest known copper resource in Argentina. The Miocene-Pliocene magmatism, particularly between ~11 and 6 Ma, generated the largest porphyry-type deposits with the greatest metal resources. Based on the available information ten metallogenic belts are outlined: 1) Permian Puna-Frontal Cordillera/Neuquen basement, 2) Upper Cretaceous–Eocene Neuquen, 3) late Eocene-early Oligocene, 4) late Oligocene-early Miocene, 5) middle Miocene Puna-Frontal Cordillera, 6) middle Miocene Precordillera, 7) late Miocene Cordillera, 8) late Miocene-Pliocene Cordillera, 9) late Miocene-Pliocene Northern Sierras Pampeanas, 10) late Miocene-Pliocene Famatina. These ten metallogenic belts accumulate 74.21 Mt Cu, 1.70 Mt Mo, 2160.66 t Au and 23,876.71 t Ag of known resources and approximately 239 Mt Cu, 6.4 Mt Mo, 4240 t Au and 77,900 t Ag contained in undiscovered deposits. The Miocene belts are the most endowed, confirming their economic importance as well as their prospectivity for exploration. The largest total known resources are hosted by the late Miocene belt in the Frontal Cordillera, followed by the late Eocene-Early Oligocene one and the Miocene-Pliocene belt in the Sierras Pampeanas. The continuation of the late Miocene-Pliocene Cordillera belt that extends from Los Bronces and El Teniente in Chile, further south into Argentina, is here considered the most prospective underexplored belt.