LAUSR

Sexual minority men (SMM) who drink heavily are at a greater risk for developing alcohol use disorders (AUD) and associated negative consequences. Barriers to treatment prevent SMM from accessing traditional care, and moderation-based alcohol treatment is a more desirable alternative. As such, investigating effective goal setting in moderation-based alcohol treatment, particularly, which goals yield the most effective outcomes, is warranted. Applying the tenets of Goal Setting Theory, this study explored the relationship between goal difficulty and goal achievement. In a secondary data analysis of a randomized controlled trial that delivered a combination of medication (i.e., naltrexone) and behavioral (i.e., Modified Behavioral Self-Control Training) treatment for SMM with AUD (N = 178), generalized estimating equations tested the effect of goal difficulty (defined as the proposed magnitude of change from current drinking in number of drinking days and number of heavy drinking days) on goal achievement at Months 0, 3, 6, and 9. Goal importance, self-efficacy, and AUD severity were tested as moderators. Findings yielded a significant positive relationship between goal difficulty and goal achievement for number of drinking days but a negative relationship for the number of heavy drinking days. Moderators of these relationships were not found. In order to increase the likelihood of achieving their goals in moderation-based alcohol treatment, SMM should initially consider setting more difficult goals for reducing drinking days. Additionally, goals of more conservative difficulty should be set for reducing heavy drinking days.