LAUSR

HYPOTHESIS AND BACKGROUND Hydrodilatation and physiotherapy are commonly used treatments for primary frozen shoulder. Little is known about the optimal form of physiotherapy. This study reports a randomized controlled trial comparing 2 forms of physiotherapy after hydrodilatation. The null hypothesis was that there would be no difference between the 2 groups at 1 year as measured by the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS). METHODS We randomized 41 patients undergoing hydrodilatation for primary frozen shoulder into 2 treatment groups: group 1 (n = 20) underwent supervised physiotherapy in addition to a home exercise program, and group 2 (n = 21) followed a self-directed home exercise program in isolation. Assessment was carried out by a blinded research nurse at baseline, 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. The primary outcome measure was the OSS. Other measures were range of movement, visual analog scale pain score, and EQ-5D index. RESULTS There was no significant difference between the treatment groups at any time point as measured by the OSS or EQ-5D index. In group 1, the OSS improved significantly from 25.00 (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.92-28.08) at baseline to 38.29 (95% CI, 34.01-42.58; P < .0001) at 4 weeks and 43.71 (95% CI, 41.61-45.80; P < .0001) at 1 year. In group 2, the OSS improved significantly from 26.60 at baseline (95% CI, 22.50-30.70) to 40.07 (95% CI, 36.77-43.36; P < .0001) at 4 weeks and 43.00 (95% CI, 39.69-46.31; P < .0001) at 1 year. All outcome measures improved significantly from baseline to 4 weeks. CONCLUSION In this group of patients, after a hydrodilatation procedure for the treatment of primary frozen shoulder, there was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between supervised physiotherapy in addition to a home exercise program and a self-directed home exercise program in isolation.