LAUSR

Muscle actions are typically divided into 3 categories: concentric, isometric, and eccentric. An active muscle that is shortening and produces positive mechanical work is said to work concentrically; an active muscle that is not changing its length, and thus does not produce net work, is said to work isometrically; and an active muscle that is elongated by external forces, and thus absorbs work, or produces negative work, is said to work eccentrically. Concentric and isometric muscle actions are well studied and well understood, and they fit well into the way we think about muscle contraction on the molecular level: the sliding filament and the cross-bridge theory. In contrast, eccentric muscle actions are not nearly as much studied as concentric and isometric actions, and they do not fit well into the crossbridge theory thinking (e.g., Herzog). Muscles working eccentrically can produce much greater forces than muscles working concentrically or isometrically, they remain stronger following the eccentric action (residual force enhancement, e.g., Edman et al., Herzog and Leonard), they require less energy per unit of force, and eccentric muscle actions are occurring in everyday life all the time. Eccentric muscle actions have also been associated with increased risks for muscle injury (e.g., Brooks et al., Armstrong et al.), instability of force production and sarcomere lengths (e.g., Morgan), and inhibition of voluntary activation (e.g., Westing et al.). However, eccentric muscle actions remain understudied, and many of the phenomena associated with eccentric actions have eluded satisfactory explanation. Eccentric muscle actions, the properties associated with them, and the underlying mechanistic explanations remain poorly understood. In this special issue of the Journal of Sport and Health Science (JSHS), experts in the field have tackled some of the mysteries surrounding eccentric muscle actions. They have addressed the mechanical properties of eccentric muscle action (force production and residual force enhancement), the neural control and muscle inhibitions associated with eccentric muscle actions, and issues associated with eccentric muscle action and injuries as a tool for rehabilitation. Herzog discusses why muscles are stronger when they are actively lengthened compared to when they are shortening, using the cross-bridge theory. He then identifies the