LAUSR

OBJECTIVE Determine the efficacy of a novel low-cost, reusable simulator for training fundamental skills associated with safe and effective intraoperative cholangiography (IOC). DESIGN The simulator uses a balloon and retention suture tubing (representing the gallbladder, cystic duct, common bile duct, and common hepatic duct) attached to a piece of wood and placed in a laparoscopic trainer (representing the abdominal cavity) covered by a piece of simulated skin to obscure it. Following a tutorial on performing a simulated IOC using this, simulation participants independently completed a video-recorded simulated IOC and a post-training survey about the appearance and perceived usefulness of the IOC simulator as a training tool. Two experienced surgeons assessed participants' IOC performance using an IOC procedural checklist developed for this purpose. Procedural time (in seconds) was recorded and used as an additional measure of performance. SETTING The OhioHealth Learning Center simulation facility in the Department of Surgery at Riverside Methodist Hospital, a large tertiary care independent medical center that is part of the OhioHealth care system. PARTICIPANTS Eleven attending surgeons and 16 general surgery residents of different levels participated in the simulation. Two experienced surgeons assessed participants' IOC performance. One participated in the simulation along with the other 10 surgeons; the other did not. RESULTS High-experience participants completed more steps and spent less time than low-experience individuals; however, differences were not statistically significant. There was substantial agreement between the 2 observers regarding participants' performance. Participants scored the simulator as realistic and useful in teaching relevant steps associated with IOC. CONCLUSIONS Despite differences between high- and low-experience participants in steps completed and time spent, these results did not prove statistically significant. Additional studies to increase sample size are warranted to determine if significant differences exist. However, participants did generally find the simulator to be an effective training tool.