LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Allowing Respondents To Skip Items During Electronic Collection Of Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Data: Does It Matter?

Photo by lcma1028 from unsplash

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Complete and accurate data is the cornerstone of any clinical trial – without it, it is impossible to make sound inferences about the safety and effectiveness of an experimental… Click to show full abstract

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Complete and accurate data is the cornerstone of any clinical trial – without it, it is impossible to make sound inferences about the safety and effectiveness of an experimental treatment. Data on the patient’s experience of a disease/condition and its treatment in clinical trials has grown in importance over the years, with an industry focus on the development of high quality clinical outcome assessment (COA) tools and, in particular, patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. The traditional technology for capturing PRO data has been paper. However, with the recognition of the limitations of paper-based data collection and the increased availability of reliable and relatively inexpensive hardware, the electronic collection of these data (i.e., ePRO) is rapidly becoming the mainstream method of data capture in clinical trials.

Keywords: outcome pro; reported outcome; electronic collection; pro data; collection; patient reported

Journal Title: Value in Health
Year Published: 2017

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.