LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Procedural and 12 month in-hospital costs of primary infra-popliteal bypass surgery, infra-popliteal best endovascular treatment, and major lower limb amputation for Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia.

Photo by keenangrams from unsplash

BACKGROUND Chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI) is a growing global problem due to the widespread use of tobacco and increasing prevalence of diabetes. Although the financial consequences are considerable, few… Click to show full abstract

BACKGROUND Chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI) is a growing global problem due to the widespread use of tobacco and increasing prevalence of diabetes. Although the financial consequences are considerable, few studies have compared the relative cost-effectiveness of different CLTI management strategies. The Bypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL)-2 trial is randomising CLTI patients to primary infra-popliteal (IP) vein bypass surgery (BS) or best endovascular treatment (BET) and includes a comprehensive within-trial cost-utility analysis. AIM To compare over a 12-month time horizon, the costs of primary IP BS, IP best endovascular treatment (BET), and major limb major amputation (MLLA) to inform the BASIL-2 cost-utility analysis. METHODS We compared procedural human resource (HR) costs and total in-hospital costs for the index admission, and over the following 12-months, in 60 consecutive patients undergoing primary IP BS (n=20), IP BET (n=20), or MLLA (10 transfemoral and 10 transtibial ) for CLTI within the BASIL prospective cohort study. RESULTS Procedural HR costs were greatest for BS (BS £2,551, 95% CI: £1,934-2,807 vs. MLLA £1,130 95% CI: £1,046-1,297 vs. BET £329, 95% CI: £242-390, p<.001, Kruskal-Wallis) due to longer procedure duration and greater staff requirement. With regard to the index admission, MLLA was the most expensive due to longer hospital stay (MLLA £13,320, 95% CI: £8,986-18,616 vs. BS £8,714, 95% CI: £6,097-11,973 vs. BET £4,813, 95% CI: £3,529-6,097, p<.001, Kruskal-Wallis). The total cost of the index admission and in-hospital care over the following 12-months remained least for BET (MLLA £26,327, 95% CI: £17,653-30,458 vs. BS £20,401, 95% CI: £12,071-23,926 vs. BET £12,298, 95% CI: £6,961-15,439, p<.001, Kruskal-Wallis). CONCLUSION Over a 12-month time horizon, MLLA and IP BS are more expensive than IP BET in terms of procedural HR costs and total in-hospital costs. These economic data together with quality of life data from BASIL-2 will inform the calculation of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for different CLTI management strategies within the BASIL-2 cost-utility analysis.

Keywords: limb; bet; mlla; cost; infra popliteal

Journal Title: Journal of vascular surgery
Year Published: 2021

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.