LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Contemporary Management and Natural History of Aberrant Right Subclavian Artery.

Photo by homajob from unsplash

OBJECTIVE Aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) is the most common congenital anomaly of the aortic arch. There is a paucity of literature regarding the management of these patients. The purpose… Click to show full abstract

OBJECTIVE Aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) is the most common congenital anomaly of the aortic arch. There is a paucity of literature regarding the management of these patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate contemporary management strategies and natural history of ARSA in these patients. METHODS A single-center retrospective review of patients diagnosed with ARSA from 2009 to 2019 was performed. CT imaging was analyzed and aortic and ARSA diameters were measured at 10-different segments. Demographic data, comorbidities, and operative interventions were collected. Patients were categorized into those that were intervened upon, and those that were managed expectantly. Linear mixed effect models were used to estimate annual ARSA diameter changes. RESULTS Thirty patients with ARSA were identified. Seventeen (57%) were female. Average age for the cohort was 54.5 ± 14.6 years. Twenty patients (67%) underwent operative repair at the time of presentation and 10 patients (33%) were initially observed. The most common presenting symptom was dysphagia (30%). Four of the 10 patients, which were initially managed expectantly, subsequently required intervention. Thirteen (13/24, 54%) of the operative interventions performed were hybrid procedures involving right carotid-subclavian bypass or transposition and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Mean diameter of ARSA at its origin was 20.4 ± 5.7 mm and the mean cross-sectional aortic diameter at the level of ARSA was 31.8 ± 8.5mm for the entire cohort. In patients that were initially observed and subsequently required intervention, the largest change in ARSA cross-sectional diameter was observed 1-cm distal to vessel ostium at a rate of 3.05 mm per year (95% CI [1.54-4.56], p = <0.001). No statistically significant changes in annual growth rate of the aortic segments was observed in the entire cohort or those patients that underwent intervention (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION The decision to intervene on an ARSA should be individualized based on presence of symptoms (e.g., dysphagia lusoria) or complications (dissection, concomitant aortic aneurysmal disease, or enlarging Kommerell diverticulum). Asymptomatic patients with non-aneurysmal ARSA may not require any intervention and maybe safely observed. Measurement of cross-sectional ARSA diameter 1-cm distal to the ostium of the vessel might aid in surveillance of vessel diameter changes. Additional studies are needed to determine specific size criteria as an indication for operative repair of asymptomatic KD.

Keywords: arsa; management; subclavian artery; right subclavian; aberrant right; diameter

Journal Title: Journal of vascular surgery
Year Published: 2021

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.