LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Reply to comments on “Uncertainty and bias in electronic tide gauge records: Evidence from collocated sensors” by Pytharouli S., Chaikalis S. and Stiros S.C., Measurement 125: 496–508, 2018

Photo from academic.microsoft.com

Abstract This is a Reply to Comments by Arup et al. on the paper by Pytharouli et al. (2018), recently published in Measurement. Arup et al. (thereafter “Comment”), although they… Click to show full abstract

Abstract This is a Reply to Comments by Arup et al. on the paper by Pytharouli et al. (2018), recently published in Measurement. Arup et al. (thereafter “Comment”), although they endorsed the conclusions of our study (need of collocated sensors, different performance of sensors, need for metadata, accuracy of tide gauges, etc.), they state in their conclusion that “this paper is misleading in several respects and that the statistical analyses undertaken have little value”. This conclusion is unfortunate and unjustified, as we explain below.

Keywords: collocated sensors; reply comments; uncertainty bias; measurement; comments uncertainty

Journal Title: Measurement
Year Published: 2020

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.