LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Comparison of the quality of beef jerky processed by traditional and modern drying methods from different districts in Inner Mongolia.

Photo from wikipedia

The influence of drying methods on the quality of beef jerky from Inner Mongolia was discussed. Beef jerky processed by traditional natural freeze-drying from Huhhot (HT) and Bayan Nur (BT)… Click to show full abstract

The influence of drying methods on the quality of beef jerky from Inner Mongolia was discussed. Beef jerky processed by traditional natural freeze-drying from Huhhot (HT) and Bayan Nur (BT) was tough, chewy, red and lustrous, while that processed by modern hot air drying from Huhhot (HM) and Bayan Nur (BM) was cohesive, hard, brown and dark, as observed by the moisture content (MC), shear force and colour. HT and BT had high free fatty acid (FFA) contents. And HM and BM had high free amino acid (FAA) contents. HT and BT had high hydrocarbon, aldehyde and ketone contents, while HM and BM had high nitrogen-containing compound contents. The higher hydrocarbon, acid and ester contents were observed in BT and BM, and higher nitrogen-containing compound contents were observed in HT and HM. The traditional method was related to a typical green grassy, fatty, meaty and sweet odour. The modern method increased nitrogen-containing compound contents, generating a roasted beef odour.

Keywords: beef; quality beef; inner mongolia; beef jerky; drying methods

Journal Title: Meat science
Year Published: 2020

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.