LAUSR

Abstract Several analytical techniques have shown use for the identification of historical synthetic organic pigments (SOPs) in samples. However, as the techniques differ—for example, in the extent of sample intervention, modes of detection, and limits of detection—so do they differ in results and insights into the colorants and colorant derivatives in a sample. Liquid chromatography (LC) is infrequently applied to the task of SOP identification, despite its ability to differentiate similar molecules, detect at low concentrations, and separate of complex samples and its established usage for organic dyes. This research compared results obtained with micro-Raman spectroscopy and pyrolysis gas chromatography with results from ultra-high performance (UP)LC coupled with photodiode array detection (UPLC-PDA), and high resolution mass spectrometry (UPLC-HRMS) to judge the quantity and quality of SOP information obtained by each technique. In this study, 67 historical samples were analyzed from historical samples and sample books (1918-1950), consisting of 10 oil paint tubes, 45 oil-bound paint-outs, and 13 gum-bound pigment washes using sample sizes less than a milligram. As few studies have used LC for SOP identification, special attention is also paid to issues around sample preparation and interpretation of results from UPLC-PDA and UPLC-PDA-HRMS results. Finally, archival sources and other contemporary documents are used to contextualize and evaluate the plausibility of the analytical results. The results indicate that specific combinations of analytical techniques are required for confident SOP identifications. While Raman results were accurate and independent of sample solubility, they relied heavily on database completeness and were not sensitive to mixtures or differences in relative amounts of SOPs. UPLC-PDA was an effective complement for these shortcomings, except for a few samples that were insoluble. The use of HRMS was critical for the elucidation of unknown SOPs.