LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Comparative analysis of machine learning approaches on the prediction of the electronic properties of perovskites: A case study of ABX3 and A2BB’X6

Photo by mbrunacr from unsplash

Abstract Machine learning (ML) methods have recently been widely employed to tackle several problems in quantum mechanics and materials science. Their main objective is to develop surrogate models that can… Click to show full abstract

Abstract Machine learning (ML) methods have recently been widely employed to tackle several problems in quantum mechanics and materials science. Their main objective is to develop surrogate models that can be used to bypass the costly Schrodinger equations and their approximations such as the density functional theory. However, most approaches so far have focused on perovskite-oxides and finite bandgap that are thought to be most related to solar cells. This limits their generalizability and the range of perovskites that can be captured, potentially limiting possibilities for the discovery of novel perovskites. Therefore, the current study includes finite and infinite bandgap, and investigates a more diverse set of perovskites, including oxides and halides occupying the X-anionic sites. Twelve ML techniques are then described, implemented and compared against each other on the prediction of the formation energy and the energy band gap of two distinctive crystal configurations: ABX3 and A2BB'X6. The samples are initially described using well developed and identical features. In addition, the effect of the Energy Above Hull feature is systematically investigated among the set of initial features. As a result, the predictive performance of the formation energy is greatly improved. The Support Vector Regression (SVR) model is found to best predict the formation energy with error metrics at 0.055 eV/atom MAE, 0.096 eV/atom RMSE and 99 % R2 on the test set. Higher marginal errors are observed in the prediction of the energy bandgap, with SVR accuracy measurements evaluated at 0.462 eV MAE, 0.662 eV RMSE, and 85.18 % R2 on the test set. The study of the sample size effect shows that the Gradient Boosting Regression (GBR) and Random Forest Regression (RFR) models are better suited for energy bandgap prediction over the SVR model. Finally, feature importance is used to inspect the relative importance among all input features considered in study. It was found that a strong relationship exists between the standard-deviated electronegativity and the formation energy. All data and codes implemented in this study are openly available at: github.com/chenebuah/perovskite-ML .

Keywords: formation energy; study; prediction; abx3 a2bb; energy; machine learning

Journal Title: Materials today communications
Year Published: 2021

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.